Jump to content

Commons:Undeletion requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Translate this page

Shortcuts: COM:UNDEL • COM:UR • COM:UND • COM:DRV

Other languages:

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Commons deletion (policy)
(Missing: 0 timestamps • 0 reasons • 0 subpages) • 0 malformed
189 copyvios • 3 duplicates • 43 adverts • 108 selfies • 28 others
v • d • e

Finding out why a file was deleted

First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.
  • If some information is missing in the deleted image description, you may be asked some questions. It is generally expected that such questions are responded in the following 24 hours.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Projects that accept fair use
* Wikipedia: als | ar | bar | bn | be | be-tarask | ca | el | en | et | eo | fa | fi | fr | frr | he | hr | hy | id | is | it | ja | lb | lt | lv | mk | ms | pt | ro | ru | sl | sr | th | tr | tt | uk | vi | zh | +/−

Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted.
  • Do not post e-mail or telephone numbers to yourself or others.
  • In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.

Closing discussions

In general, discussions should be closed only by administrators.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Current requests

File:Grubtheme sekiro.png File doesn't fulfil requirements for deletion

I believe that this file isn't eligible for deletion because it's author has released it on GitHub under a free license (MIT license) source and because this image doesn't contain any derivative work from the game Sekiro (also see: commons rule).

Thank you for participating in this discussion Kakučan (talk) 12:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose This is the only public repository of semimqmo on GitHub and they posted on Reddit that they just took this wallpaper from https://wallpapersden.com/sekiro-shadows-die-twice-art-wallpaper/2560x1440 where the author is not even credited. And maybe some people do not think of a software license applying to images  REAL 💬 ⬆   15:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose As noted in the deletion comment, there is no evidence that the creator of the image is the person who posted it with the {{Mit}} license at github. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see in this and this commit the final screenshot is composed of resources which automatically fulfill the commons rule of threshold of originality except this one (which is considered it to be not semimqmo's original work). I found this theory to be true but I couldn't find any license posted with this resource which leads me to think that John Devlin had given a permission to semimqmo to repost this resource under MIT license (otherwise semimqmo's repo on GitHub would've been taken down for copyright infringement). Thank you for your response Kakučan (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I say again -- there is no evidence that Devlin has given a free license. The fact that GitHub has not acted against this post proves nothing. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support This is free software. It would be very contrary to current practice that a non-free image would be distributed with it. So I think that the license applies to the whole package, which includes the code and the image. Yann (talk) 18:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a logo for JS13K games. I am writing on behalf of the creators Andrzej and Ewa Mazur who wishes it to not be deleted. This image was being used on the wikipedia page for js13k also. Thank you for fixing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slackluster (talk • contribs)

 Support If this is the logo shown at the top of https://js13kgames.com Andrzej Mazur uploaded this file under CC0 in 2018  REAL 💬 ⬆   21:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Although Ewa Mazur is mentioned on the web site, Andrzej is not. This logo was uploaded by USER:Mypoint13k in 2021. The web site has "©2024 js13kGames & authors". If the owners of the site actually want the logo freely licensed here, they must do it with a message to VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He is in https://github.com/orgs/js13kGames/people. He uploaded the logo on the website in a GitHub repository under CC0 in 2018  REAL 💬 ⬆   14:36, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support This is free software. It would be very contrary to current practice that a non-free image would be distributed with it. So I think that the license applies to the whole package, which includes the code and the image. Yann (talk) 15:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yann I don't think so. Aside from the explicit copyright notice which I cited above, the legal section of the web site has
"As a condition of submission, Entrant grants the Competition Organizer, its subsidiaries, agents and partner companies, a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to use, reproduce, adapt, modify, publish, distribute, publicly perform, create a derivative work from, and publicly display the Submission."
That is a free license only in the sense that no money changes hands. It does not include the right to freely license anything. Also, please remember that even in the case where the software may be freely licensed, the logo for it is often not. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is an agreement for entrants who submit games to the competition, not anything to do with the website itself, which in fact has no license on GitHub at all. However, one of the staff of js13kGames uploaded this logo in a different repository under CC0. The license in a GitHub repository applies to all the files in it unless otherwise noted, which has not been done so there  REAL 💬 ⬆   15:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The license in a GitHub repository applies to all the files in it unless otherwise noted. Yes, I agree with that. Yann (talk) 16:49, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@999real: This is not the same logo. Feel free to upload it under CC0 providing that source. Ankry (talk) 08:00, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biserica parohială Sfântul Anton de Padova - Brezoi.jpg

The page Home at Brezoi is created by me and 90% of the photos posted there are taken by me. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=822656503228773&set=pb.100064532926044.-2207520000&type=3 I upset an admin, Pafsanias, who deleted a page while I was working on it (I admit it was my fault, I launched it without links because I am out of the country and I don't have enough time and roaming) to whom I politely drew attention that I was still working on the page, empirically, as I may need help... The reward... he allied himself with another admin, Ziv, who if he found two or three pictures uploaded by me, for which the own license is not justified, deleted almost all of them, even though I tried to explain to him that it was an error or meaningless revenge, destroying entire pages and hours of work. Honestly, I don't have the time and nerves to invest in these absurd conflicts, with people who don't collaborate but just crack the whip. If someone finds someone to restore the pages and correct my errors, fine, if not, that's it. Just as an idea to see how superficial Ziv's research was at the instigation of Pasfanias - her link leads to a photo posted by a group called Brezoi by admin Elena Badica on December 16, 2022...after I posted it on my page on December 2, 2022, being a processing of the original file posted on October 20, 2021...

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=4471342819596144&set=a.459257692901991 I think that as Ziv answered me...it is enough to demonstrate the bad faith of the two admins, who under the aegis of a "collaboration" vandalized several pages.

you also deleted the photo from the page dedicated to the city of Brezoi, taken by me in 2013 with an iPhone 4s, a photo of which I am very proud, because I climbed the mountain after undergoing a fairly serious operation... but you two heavenly admins of Wikipedia, full of unbeatable information, vandalized the three pipes three springs... https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=512522355478230&set=a.459257696235324... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudiupt (talk • contribs) 19:56, 9 June 2025 (UTC) (Claudiupt (talk) 21:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC))[reply]

Am adaugat tuturor fotografiilor postate de mine pe pagina mea de facebook mentiunea "Licenta free pentru Wikipedia CC0." Daca este suficient, as vrea sa trag linie aici si acum tuturor disputelor care nu duc la nimic constructiv. Wikipedia trebuie sa fie despre cunoastere si colaborare, nu despre aratatul muschilor si infatuare. Va multumesc tuturor celor care puneti umarul si va aduceti contributia, fiindca doar asa prin cunoastere putem combate rasismul, xenofobia, antisemitismul, islamofobia, creștinofobia, intoleranța religioasă
homofobia și transfobia, misoginia și sexismul, ableismul, clasismul, discriminarea economică, ageismul, naționalismul extremist, discriminarea digitală, neglijarea mediului, etc. Claudiupt (talk) 03:26, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mississippi's CW 2024.svg

Could be in use on-air Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Need something stronger than "could". If you have evidence of real life use, please present it. Abzeronow (talk) 02:45, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:عمر عبد الرزاق.jpg

Undelete Request

File:عمر حبيب عبدالرزاق.jpg

please if you can undelete this picture because it belongs to عمر حبيب عبدالرزاق--Zaiinulabdeen (talk) 16:30, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose The upload gives us only the name Omar Habib Abdul Razzaq and nothing else. He does not appear on Google. Why should we keep his image? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:05, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Schoolgirls in Dorking, London (6258299657) (cropped).jpg

The talk page itself adds useful context as to why the photo was so controversial for us to host. I do not agree on it being deleted--Trade (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, as the image itself is already deleted. Isn't this information contained in the DR-discussion Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dorking Schoolgirls Patiently Waiting For Mum (6258299657) (cropped).jpg ? --Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's all there, and that very lengthy DR was closed as Kept. It seems to me this a perfect image to illustrate articles on school uniforms, which it was doing until its uncropped version was deleted after a much shorter discussion. We have two schoolgirls in uniform, completely unidentifiable. It is unfortunate that the original uploader made a comment in poor taste, but it is a quality image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak oppose I stand by my comments in the original DR. Abzeronow (talk) 19:28, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What does this have to do with the talk page? Trade (talk) 19:54, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Talk Page is usually not useful without the file. I suppose I could copy the contents to the DR talk page if you think we need a historical record of the comments. Abzeronow (talk) 20:00, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good Trade (talk) 20:03, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Talk page comments moved to DR talk page to give historical context. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abzeronow, I do not understand why you closed this less than two hours after it was opened. The DR had 3,700 words of discussion. It surely merits more than two hours here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion was about the talk page, not the file.
If you want the file back you need to start your own seperate undeletion request Trade (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The requestor wanted the talk page contents, but I don't mind reopening to discuss the file itself (I wasn't trying to cut that discussion short). Abzeronow (talk) 01:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motecuzoma isabelel.png

I've painted the image, to illustrate the articles of Isabel Moctezuma (C.XVI aztec historic character). Because there are no known images available from her. It's based on the general information available from the character, meaning ethnicity and approximate age in te times that make her relevant. Just like any other representation of Isabel Moctezuma.

For ideological reasons, I prefered to declare the author anonymous. So apparently it was the reason for de deletion, because Commons has no way to be sure that I have the legal capacity to donate the copyright.

So I uploaded again, declaring myself as the author and contacted permission-commons@wikimedia.org (Andrzej Kamil Rybicki) explaining the situation.

Please let me know what sort of evidence of my authorship you need me to provide.

There are lots of images like that in Commons, representing historic characters, not all of them from famous or notable artists:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Villarroel1.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:COM_V2_D180_The_Prince_Ixtlilxochitl.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kresba_Marilyn_Monroe.jpg

Whats the difference with my contributions?

Sincerely, Ingo y gonga

The given license on the file requires attribution. I suppose COM:VRT could attribute it under a pseudonym of your choosing if they would approve permission on the file. CC-zero would solve the anonymity issue. There is also the scope issue, are you a notable artist or is this a personal artwork? Abzeronow (talk) 20:34, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Abzeronow, I have read this scope argument a few times, but cannot really follow it. In cases like this, a portrait serves a documentary purpose. A drawing can help if a photo is or was not possible under the given circumstances.
Furthermore, a very good photo is also a personal artwork. If a non-notable someone makes a good portrait photo of a person, it is considered as in scope. If that same someone draws that person, we discard the drawing as out of scope. IMO we make a distinction which is not waterproof.
Cheers, Mussklprozz (talk) 07:28, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose It may seem illogical, but that is policy -- we do not keep paintings or drawings from non-notable artists. That is particularly valid in cases such as this -- we should not be using illustrations that are one person's speculation about the subject's appearance with nothing available to confirm validity. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion_requests/Files in Category:Die Partei (Reutlingen)

About 30 files deleted as of arbitrary accusations, with no understandable comment Dulliman (talk) 02:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you disagree with them doesn't make them arbitrary. And I understood the comments and close. Jim concluded these were out of scope posters. Abzeronow (talk) 03:23, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Dulliman Das Argument out of scope verstehst Du? Die Löschung ist begründet. Wikipedia ist kein Ort für politische Kampagnen. – Do you understand the argument ‘out of scope’? The deletion is justified. Wikipedia is not a place for political campaigns. Mussklprozz (talk) 07:06, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harry Topham.jpg

These appear to be cropped images from an anonymous UK group shot from 1895 and the another group shot circa 1900 when these players were on the team. The consensus was to keep, they were deleted, then restored, then apparently deleted again. They should be restored. --RAN (talk) 04:16, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Hosting them here with false authorship / licensing is pointless. As nobody wanted to fix this information, their undeletion is also pointless. Following the recent restoration, neither the user requesting the restoration nor any of the users supporting the action did so for several months. Ankry (talk) 05:37, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barcas-Rio-logo.svg

Hi there, sorry I did not react in time for the file deletion. It needs to have the license {{TOO-Brazil}}, as is the case for other brands logos in the country (here's another example: [1]). --ArlindoPereira (talk) 08:11, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Support I think that this logo is too simple to have a US copyright. Brazil's ToO is much higher, so it is almost certain that it does not have a copyright there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arafatrahim17.jpg Please undelete this photo

Iam the photographer I have full right to use this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranimita (talk • contribs) 08:39, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose The issue here is not copyright, although I must say that it does not look like a selfie. The issue is that we do not keep personal photos from people who have made only 11 contributions to Commons. Come back here when you have a few hundred contributions. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022 Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Per my reasoning in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inflation rate, United States and eurozone, January 2018 through October 2023.png. It is clearly {{PD-chart}} regardless of what it's creator thinks about the underlying data's copyright. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:48, 11 June 2025 (UTC) @Ymblanter, Abzeronow, and WeatherWriter: Ping. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:49, 11 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Note — File:Inflation rate, United States and eurozone, January 2018 through October 2023.png has been renominated for deletion as well. WeatherWriter (talk) 12:27, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Without any new arguments. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:45, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong! New argument was presented…specifically than an administrator agreed to delete the file being requested for undeletion here based on my argument. Clearly, there is disagreement between administrators on whether Fred’s charts are copyrighted/uncommercial use only vs. public domain. If you did not detect that part of the new argument, then you clearly did not even read it carefully. Please be more careful before making statements on here Josve05a. WeatherWriter (talk) 12:47, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Support First, you can't copyright facts and the two indices reflect the facts of their underlying stock prices. Since the two indices were created by S&P and DJ, the Fed has no proprietary interest in them, and therefore has no ability to claim copyright in them even if that were possible. Second, a chart such as this is certainly produced by a charting program and not manually by a human, so it cannot have a copyright. Even if it were created manually, I doubt very much that it is creative enough to have a copyright in the USA or elsewhere as the shape of the chart is dictated by the underlying facts. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Support As Jim says, you cannot copyright facts and this is a simple chart. As Jonatan previously said, the Fred logo can be cropped or blanked out to remove potential issues. Abzeronow (talk) 01:13, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support Fine, as the person who was the DR reasoning, I will be fine with the image returning, provided it is cropped shortly after being undeleted. If it is not cropped within a reasonable timeframe, I shall re-request deletion for potential copyright issue. WeatherWriter (talk) 02:02, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deletion of my Marokko... and Ägypten... files

   File:Marokko-2012-04-0163.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0062.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0060.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0056.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0055.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0053.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0047.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0042.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0039.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0037.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0032.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0026.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0021.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0018b.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0017.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0016.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0013b.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0012c.jpg
   File:Marokko-2012-04-0011b.jpg
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-204.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-203.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-201.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-200a.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-200.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-199.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-198.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-195a.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-195.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-194.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-193.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-192.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-191.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-188c.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-188b.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-188a2.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-188a.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-188.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-187.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-186.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-185.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-184.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-182a.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-182.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-181a.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-180.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-179b.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-179a.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-178.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-176a.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-176.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-173c.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-173b.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-171d.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-171c.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-171b.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-171a.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-171.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-170.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-169b.JPG
   File:Ägypten-2015-03-168a.JPG

I am very sorry but I never wanted to request the deletion of these files. I tried to establish some bulk corrections with the newly uploaded files using VisualFileChange.js. I'm afraid I made a big mistake! I would be very happy if you could restore all these files. Thank you. --M.Schoettler (talk) 11:30, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files were deleted based on this DR Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by M.Schoettler. --Túrelio (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, that I forgot to set the korrekt action from deletion to free replacement using VisualFileChange.js. But I never intended to get these files deleted. Would you please restore them again. Thank you. M.Schoettler (talk) 12:47, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It would ease restoration, if you could wikilink all the files in the list above, as I had done for the first one. --Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have linked them  REAL 💬 ⬆   18:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to thank User:Túrelio User:Rosenzweig and User:999real for your help. I hope I learned my lesson :-)

✓ Done: I have restored the files. Please be more careful. --Rosenzweig τ 19:11, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that this file be undeleted File:Disco King Mario.jpg Undelete request thank you.

This file should not have been deleted. This files violates no copyrights. All images are in use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License ((CC BY 3.0))

Lenghty explanation of the virtues of a CC license
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (CC BY 3.0 Unported License) grants others the right to use, share, and adapt others work as long as they credit original owner Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License appropriately. It allows for commercial and non-commercial use, remixing, and building upon your work, but requires attribution and no additional restrictions on subsequent users.

Key aspects of CC BY 3.0: Permissible Uses: You can use, share, and adapt the work. Commercial Use: The license allows for commercial use of the work.

Remixing and Building: Others can remix, tweak, and build upon the work. Attribution Required: You must attribute the original creator and their work, which includes the licensor's name, the title of the work, and the URL for online material.

No Additional Restrictions: Subsequent users are not subject to any additional restrictions beyond those outlined in the license. In essence, CC BY 3.0 is a relatively permissive license that encourages sharing and collaboration while still acknowledging the original creator.

I would like this image restored thank you Edward Myer (talk) 11:48, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The file was deleted due to copyvio-suspicion based on the information provided in this DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disco King Mario.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 12:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose As the DR noted, an ABC logo appears in the video from which this is taken, so it is likely that the person putting the CC license on the film did not have the right to do so. See Commons:License laundering. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yuhan Logo (ENG).svg

Below TOO in South Korea--Trade (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jody Dei.jpg

original photo

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests&oldid=969879230"